Why Go to Church?
In writing these blogs, I often ask the rhetorical question, “What’s the point?” about a specific issue. But you could ask that about the blog itself. Why write a blog called “Skeptical Faith?”
I write it because I hope to help people who have given up on God and/or religion to think through their reasons for doing so and to offer the view that there’s no conflict between skepticism and faith. I don’t assume that readers haven’t thought them through. It’s just that, in my opinion, you can’t be done with questions of faith. Honesty in the face of daily questions – assuming we’re conscious of them – requires us to keep coming back to them.
And giving up on God and giving up on religion are, obviously, related, and related to the currently popular notion that you can be “spiritual without being religious.”
Anything More Than Self-Betterment?
It’s a catchy phrase and I suppose it’s possible, but in my view, it’s unlikely. Can you really be spiritual on your own, apart from the community of believers? Can you be spiritual while ignoring the historical religious figures who “invented” spirituality and the traditions they founded? Even if you’re able to stick to them, can you be sure that your spiritual practices are anything more than exercises in self-betterment?
Trying to go it alone spiritually also disconnects us from the moral authority of religion. Ah, you might say, that’s good because religion has lost its moral authority – if it ever had any.
I don’t believe that’s true. In fact, I believe much of our moral consciousness, whether we’re “spiritual” or “religious” or not, and whether or not we’re aware of it, derives from what we’ve learned from the lives, if not words, of our religious parents, grandparents and relatives.
Leading People Toward Love
And religious leaders, overcoming the stains that stick to them because of wrongdoing on the part of some of their colleagues, are continuing to attempt to lead people toward love, kindness, compassion, generosity and the adoption of meaningful, God-filled lives.
Many people are uncomfortable with the religions of parents and grandparents and those religions’ moral positions. To some extent, that’s because those religions’ moral stances are sometimes contrary to the current climate of opinion, which is indifferent or hostile toward God and religion.
But what good is a church or religion that automatically approves of the whims of contemporary culture? Is it saying anything that society isn’t already saying to itself? Shouldn’t religion make you think critically about everything in life and judge it by the standards of your faith? Should a religion change its beliefs and practice with every generation? How credible would that faith be?
Of course, the church – as the famous Protestant theologian Karl Barth said paraphrasing St. Augustine – should be “reformed but always reforming.” In the case of Christianity, that means continually asking “what Jesus meant” and trying to conform to Jesus’ leadership, no matter how slow or extended the process.
Spiritual Without Church?
So do you have to “go to church” to be spiritual or even “religious” or “Christian?” Not necessarily. A psalmist wrote:
“Where can I go from your spirit, or where can I flee from your face? If I climb the heavens, you are there. If I lie in the grave, you are there. If I take the wings of the dawn and dwell at the sea’s furthest end, Even there your hand would lead me, your right hand would hold me fast.”
In my opinion, many people who fail to participate in regular religious services but insist they’re “spiritual” may be delusional. It’s like medical self-treatment or being your own lawyer or financial adviser. They’re possible, but why do so when there’s a better way?
